Saturday, March 20, 2010

Implications for Instructional Design on the Web

Go to Module 2 Go to Module 3 Go to Module 4

Go to Module 5 Go to Module 6


When looking at instructional design for distance learning, Dr. Michael Simonson (video) explains that learning online and learning in the traditional setting are not identical. However, the learner should be able to learn the same content, although differences do occur as to learning experiences and how to meet the learning outcomes.

Moller, Forshay, and Huett list some of the problems of creating equivalency in traditional and e-learning courses:
1. Online courses are more work to create and maintain.
2. Online instructors fear unfavorable evaluations from their students which could affect tenure and promotions.
3. Online instructors aren't recognized for their efforts put forth in their courses.

The three authors go on to suggest several ways to minimize the problems of online learning. One suggestion to minimize problems with online learning is to include tutorial techniques to support the learner. The educator should also include variety when planning types of interaction and feedback. Finally, another suggestion is to use performance-based assessments that are easy to use and simple in design.

I do agree that online learning is a trend that is becoming more popular. In the current state of our economy, online learning seems much more cost effective in the long run. There would be less vehicles transporting to the brick-and-mortar school, as well as less paper waste from traditonal pencil and paper assignments. The school system in which I teach (Georgia) is moving to Moodle to supplement traditional classroom instruction and assignments. Students can watch videos online, upload student-made powerpoints, answer surveys, and so forth.

Will online learning (e-learning) replace the traditional school setting? Not at this time. Many students still need that one-on-one relationship with the teacher. Many academically challenged students demand that support from the regular classroom teacher, as well as resource teachers. Manipulatives, while often available online, enrich instruction if the tactile experience is "3-D" or live. There are also those students who lack the focus or desire to manage their own learning without the supervision and support offered in the regular classroom setting.



Web Links:

http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdf?vid=5&hid=5&sid=db066ed8-d16c-4f21-b187-98fa22d45559%40sessionmgr10

http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=5&sid=c3cf03be-51bc-41b2-beea-199ff32785da%40sessionmgr14

http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=5&sid=7e9a00bf-716c-477f-80d9-0e8a73a843c0%40sessionmgr4























3 comments:

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Brenda,

Your recapitulation of ideas from the original article is excellent. In metacognitive terms, I was looking forward to reading your own ideas about the statements of the authors. You did express your agreement with the authors' assessment of the eLearning trend, and describe some benefits of this. Yet, I would like to hear more of your own ideas about the tantalizing part of your post, which is about why eLearning will not replace the traditional classroom model. I was not sure what grades you are referring to at the conclusion of your post.

BrendaY. said...

Hi Learntocracy,
Thanks for your comments. (Also, thanks for the email about my wiki. I am much more confident now and it looks much better, although I still have a long way to go.)

I teach fourth grade students who still require a lot of support, no matter the level of the learner. My school has a significant population of ESOL (aka, ESL) students who are still unsure of English and need language support, building background activities, vocabulary instruction, as well as support for the content.

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.